Voluntary Incapacity

Emergency Medicine News:
April 2010 – Volume 32 – Issue 4 – p 8
doi: 10.1097/01.EEM.0000370749.07758.6d
Second Opinion

Second Opinion: Capable – and Proud of It – in a World of Voluntary Incapacity

Leap, Edwin MD

Free Access

Those of us who work in emergency care are often deemed insensitive by others. When we rant about the situations we see, sensitive people genuinely believe that we’re cold, uncaring, or burned out. I have been accused of ultraconservatism, right-wing lunacy, being judgmental (the worst insult a post-modern can muster, by the way) and of being a greedy, Mercedes-driving doctor. (I drive a pickup.) Someone even said my newspaper readers should ignore my opinion about medical finances because I was just “po’mouthing,” a Southernism that implies I was making my situation sound dismal when I was actually quite well off.

Image…
Image Tools

While I’m sure that a few physicians are, in fact, cold and uncaring, most of the docs I meet are anything but. What they are, however, is possessed of the remarkable clarity about humans that can only come from working with actual people rather than theories or ideologies. It’s an insight that cannot be achieved in the purely academic world, nor is it attainable in Internet chat rooms, but it isn’t, as I long suspected, just doctors who deal with reality.

I often speak about our struggles with a dear friend and fellow church deacon who is a manager in a local grocery store. My friend is as kind a man as you’ll ever meet. Devoted to family, friends, and God, he volunteers at a local elementary school, spending time with at-risk children. He comes to church early to pray for the many things that burden his heart. He would literally give you the shirt off of his back. And he’s fed up with the abuse he sees in his grocery store.

He told me, “Ed, I see people using food stamps to buy food I could never afford. And I have a good job!” He recently held forth about a woman using her WIC (Women, Infants, and Children program) card to buy six gallons of milk at once. When he half-jokingly asked what she did with all of the milk, she pointed to a toddler and said, “She drinks all of it.” Later, leaving the store, the customer was heard to say, “What does he care? He ain’t payin’ for it!” Except, of course, that he is.

My friends who are deputies and highway patrol officers feel the same, as do many of my friends whose work as attorneys puts them in contact with the welfare and social services systems. They are often frustrated by the abuses they see, by the parade of bad decisions, and by a bureaucracy that almost seems to encourage and reward the abuse of benefits and services while rarely elevating anyone.

One of my own favorite gremlins is disability. Many of my patients seem to see disability as a career goal. A friend of mine is a school counselor. When she recently asked a young high school student what his post-graduation plans were, he never missed a beat. “Guess I’ll get disability for my nerves, like the rest of my family.”

The thing that makes those outside our circle think we’re bitter is that stories like the ones above drive us crazy. Just like patients who come to the ED for routine pregnancy tests, who ask for prescriptions for Tylenol, and who seek Family and Medical Leave Act forms for ankle sprains. In the same way as the diabetic who refuses to get a $4 prescription at Walmart but regularly goes to McDonald’s before coming to the ED.

There are doubtless well-meaning people who will read this and still marvel at our insensitivity. So I was doing a little reflection on what it is about these situations that frustrates us. Is it, after all, about the money? Are we just mad because we aren’t being paid? Well, that can’t be it. My disabled and Medicaid patients all have insurance. I’m paid for seeing them! Maybe not a full market value, but something is better than nothing.

Is it elitism? Do I consider myself better than these folks, who are often poor and uneducated? Probably not. My faith teaches me that we’re all the same in the eyes of God. And my own grandparents were laborers and small business owners as well as subsistence farmers. I have no animosity toward those who struggle.

And then it hit me! Those who struggle! I like it when people struggle, not in the sense of hopelessness or crushing misery, but meaning those who try, who set goals and go through life trying to be better, happier, more successful, more resourceful, more independent. I’m happy to help those who try, and happy to help those who are actually in need. I’ll gladly give care to the truly sick. I’ll stay late, bend over backwards, beg and borrow to do whatever it takes to help them. For those who try? Anything. If they’re trying to do what’s right, trying to get healthy, trying to rise out of generational poverty, trying to recover from an accident or mistake, a prison sentence, or a disabling injury, I’m honored to be there for them.

What bothers me, what bothers us collectively, is not that people need us. It’s not even that people need us for free. It’s that they have begun to worship at the altar of incapacity and what wise men of old called sloth. We are an overmedicated, undereducated nation bent on proving that we cannot, rather than showing that we can. Having inverted the ethics of our forefathers, our goal is no longer autonomy, but dependence.

We have abandoned the sense of guilt that in the past made our citizens try to achieve on their own to avoid being burdens. We have, in fact, abandoned the entire idea of guilt in exchange for a kind of social lovefest, where anything goes as long as we want it.

And nowhere do we see the results of this experiment more clearly, more painfully, than in the emergency department. Young and old alike swamp our departments, convinced that someone owes them money and compassion for their own dysfunctional life choices and beloved incapacity.

It isn’t that we’re burned out. It isn’t that we’re cold. It’s just that we understand better than most what it means to try. No one told us that not trying was an option. And we’re just weary of being responsible for an endless parade of patients who believe we owe them something and who consistently refuse to do anything for themselves.

So don’t let anyone call you bitter, shallow, greedy, or anything else. Gather your friends, business people, police officers, and social workers; collect their stories and pass them on. Explain that you aren’t the only person frustrated with our deteriorating social situation.

And be proud that in a world of epidemic and voluntary incapacity, you remain capable and proud of it.-Dr. Edwin Leap

Anticipatory Guidance

This is something that I don’t do enough of: ANTICIPATORY GUIDANCE.  It falls into the adage: Tell them what you are going to tell them, tell them, tell them what you told them.  One of our main roles as health care providers is to ease pain and suffering AND anxiety.  A great way to do just that is to tell your patients what they should expect while in the emergency department and beyond. This is another great article gleaned from Emergency Medical Abstracts (I have added the audio discussion from the Emergency Medical Abstracts for your listening and learning)

A PROGRAM OF ANTICIPATORY GUIDANCE FOR THE PREVENTION OF EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS FOR EAR PAIN

McWilliams, D.B., et al, Arch Ped Adol Med 162(2):151, February 2008

Let me know what you think.

Working In The Fishbowl by Dr. Jeanmonod

Working in the Fishbowl

Rebecca Jeanmonod, MD

[Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55:125-126.]

“I have a confession to make.”

This is my favorite part of the history. It’s also the part I understand the least. It typically occurs after I’ve asked questions I wouldn’t ask my mother. After I’ve inquired about the medical history, perused her potential illicit drug use, plumbed the depths of the sexual history, examined all the parts the patient wouldn’t show strangers on the beach or even a spouse in the bedroom. This is the part where I find out the secret nugget of information in whose context everything that has happened up to this point needs to be placed. This is where it will all fall into place and make sense. It’s the moment when I believe the patient knows I want to help and is showing some trust. I don’t understand it because the confession so often seems less intimate, less personal, less critical than everything else I’ve said, heard, and done in the room. But it’s my favorite part, because it has a sense of sanctity to it, a mark of the physician-patient covenant. It doesn’t happen every time, but I like it when it does.

I sit back down on the lid of a trashcan, so she knows I’m not in a rush. I’m superficially familiar with the studies about sitting when you’re talking to patients and I’m a fan of both sitting and evidence-based medicine, although I’m not sure if any studies address where you sit. I avoid the biohazard bin as a sign of respect for what might be in there (I am also a fan of signs of respect), but the trashcan is the perfect height. It also has a big lid, so I feel less unstable on it than on a stool, which is really only good for pelvics and procedures.

“Tell me what’s on your mind.”

By way of background, this woman does not see doctors. Period. She hasn’t seen a doctor since the birth of her last child 30 years ago. I am aware that I feel a little honored that she has chosen to see me, because I know this isn’t easy for her, and she wouldn’t be here if she didn’t think she needed to be. As a corollary to this, she is not insured and has no money. She is about the age of my mother, and I wonder if maybe she’s thinking all the things my mother thinks of my appearance. I try to sit up straighter and arrange myself more ladylike on my trashcan. I cover my dozen earrings with my hair.

She is here for a rash. It’s on her left buttock and has been spreading for a couple of days. She’s starting to feel unwell, with chills and fatigue. It looks to me like cellulitis, and she doesn’t seem ill enough to warrant admission. This makes her happy. I was about to write her some prescriptions, but she has stopped me from leaving, and now I am perched waiting for her confession.

“I take fish antibiotics.”

Fish antibiotics. I turn this over in my mind, trying to look at it from all angles. Is this actually a psychiatry patient? Does she think she’s a fish? Is she saying she can only take fish antibiotics? Maybe asking me to prescribe fish antibiotics? Do you need a prescription from a fish doctor to get fish antibiotics? Is she familiar with the common metaphor that the ED is a fishbowl? Is she making fun of me and my job? Is this the kind of day I’m going to have? Is my next patient going to take reptile antibiotics? Will he think he’s a dinosaur? Suddenly, my rapport with my patient teeters vertiginously on the edge of the chasm of my judging her.

“I’m sorry. What do you mean?” I can hear my tone has changed, and hope she doesn’t hear it.

“I’ve been taking fish antibiotics. You know, from a pet store. I thought you should know, because I’ve been taking fish amoxicillin for 2 days. I’ve done it for years, but this time, I’m not getting better.”

Suddenly, I understand. Aquarium drugs. The loophole of the United States prescription antibiotic system. I remember treating my own home aquarium with an antifungal tablet, and how many choices there were for antimicrobials, no prescription necessary. So she’s been on amoxicillin of some formulation or other, intended for a goldfish. I am no longer irritated or judgmental. This woman is resourceful. She has no insurance. She has no doctor. She has needed drugs over the course of 30 years and has researched what she thought she needed and treated herself to good effect up until now. She has never been to the ED before. She likely would have made a better choice for herself if she had had more information on community-acquired MRSA, and then she wouldn’t have presented for care this time, either. I wish patients didn’t do this, and I wish it wasn’t an option for them, but in the same situation, it’s something I can see myself doing. In some ways, it is what I do for myself. I decide what I think I need and prescribe it.

“Um, ok. Thanks for telling me. That’s really helpful information to have. Do you mind if I ask you how you dose it?”

“I take one tablet. I figure I’m about the size of a 10-gallon tank.”

I quickly do the math. 80 pounds. Not even close.

I write up a prescription for doxycycline and some generic discharge instructions. I add in, “It would be a good idea for you to see a primary care doctor, as this is safer than you trying to figure out what infection you have and buying antibiotics intended for an aquarium. If you do buy antibiotics for an aquarium, remember you are the size of a 20-gallon tank.” I hope this will help her make a more informed decision next time.

Chess With God by Dr. Veysman

This is a GREAT glimpse into the world of an ER doctor:

Chess With God

Boris D. Veysman, MD

[Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55:123-124.]

Give me a bad position, I will defend it. Openings, endgames, complicated positions, dull draws, I love them and I will do my very best.—Hein Donner, Chess player, 1950

Not only does God play dice, but… he sometimes throws them where they cannot be seen.—Stephen Hawking

Amidst a busy shift when patients pile in, seasoned nurses start to grumble, and my blood sugar and bladder volume are most discordant, I overhear a fourth-year medical student share wisdom with a third-year newbie. “ER’s got a good schedule if you like doing overpaid triage.” I smile, enjoying the involuntary adrenaline boost from sublimated anger, before refocusing on the labs of the 80-year-old woman with digoxin toxicity and acute renal failure, presenting with runs of unstable tachycardia, prolonged QT interval, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, and a filthy cough suggesting preseptic pneumonia.

The next 20 seconds is a synaptic typhoon. Could elevated lactate mean not sepsis but mesenteric ischemia? A benign exam would not rule it out, and she is too sick to complain of abdominal pain. Tachycardia and hypoxia suggest pulmonary embolism (PE), given her edematous legs and recently stopped Coumadin when she had a GI bleed. This also increases the risk of mesenteric clot. Yet the contrast timing is different for CT angiograms of chest and abdomen, and I will have to choose which to optimize. Both studies are perilous because of the dye load, given acute renal failure, but failure to make either diagnosis would be fatal in a patient this sick. Meanwhile, empiric anticoagulation risks another massive GI bleed. Dialysis and transfusion may be necessary damage control to be considered concurrently with the diagnostic studies. Furthermore, calcium gluconate is contraindicated in digoxin toxicity because of mostly hypothetic cardiac tetany but would probably help with the blood pressure. Calcium would also treat hyperkalemia and hypocalcemia (strangely equal at 6.5), which both contribute to cardiac toxicity. If the heart gives out, it’s my fault either way, and I find that liberating. Digibind for the hyperkalemic digoxin toxicity, but that will worsen the heart failure. Definitely fluids for hypotension and sepsis but absolutely no fluids because of pulmonary edema and renal failure.

“Dr. V, she’s 80/50,” the nurse reports. Time’s up. Make a move….

We may choose emergency medicine for different reasons, but we fall in love all over again when after a few years of practice we begin to understand its magic. For me, it’s the intensity of thought when time is short and stakes are high in a battle against the worthiest of opponents. There are many hard cases that challenge the depth of our ability and ingenuity. We believe that God plays fair and you often get a shot at winning, regardless of how dismal the malady. A broad differential and rapid and often imperfect diagnostics are often the only way to find in time what’s lethal and irreversible. And before the diagnostics are back, preemptive strikes of empiric therapy based on calculated risks and hunches may earn you a guerrilla victory.

There are no simple cases. Not at this level. There are simple doctors unwilling to try harder to optimize efficiency, cost, and outcomes, to do it with less radiation exposure, fewer side effects, and higher real and perceived quality. Every ankle and ear doesn’t need radiographs and antibiotics, but some do, and most need thoughtful pain management and anticipatory guidance, with the entire encounter limited to only a few seconds by more pressing cases. Every patient, sick or well, is a chance to be our best, to recognize when our best is not enough, and to get help before it’s too late. If it were easy, I wouldn’t want to do it.

When consultants who see the patient the next day whine about “shotgun workups,” “excessively broad antibiotics,” and “inconsistent management,” emergency physicians laugh nostalgically and think, “that was a good save.” However lacking in elegance the evaluation may appear to the hammer who sees the world as a nail, he should have spoken when he was somehow unavailable at 2 am on a Saturday. We are emergency specialists and we step up to the board, for anyone, at any time, and with a unique skill set.

We know that you don’t always get second chances playing against God. Specialists wishing to “see the patient in the morning,” surgeons who interrupt with “what did the CT scan show?” and primaries requesting to “wait for the blood cultures before treating” are occasionally right, but more often they fail to feel our sense of urgency and appear not invested in the battle. Seasoned ER docs are not desperate for approval, camaraderie, or admiration; often we can even write a rain check on respect. When squaring off against our adversary 30 times a shift, self-respect is earned and goes a long way toward self-esteem. But we deserve alliance, for others to be on our side in caring for the patient. This means trusting our instincts. This means respect for our expertise in ambiguity and patients who don’t read the textbook.

The metal doors burst open and the paramedics roll in a man who looks grayer than the sheet. “All we know is he’s got a kidney pancreas transplant with a pacemaker and he’s been depressed lately. We found him unresponsive next to some pills. Good vital signs in the truck but now I can’t feel the pulse.” The third-year med student stares blankly at the paramedic, while the fourth-year looks close to passing out. The nurses run to the gurney to transfer the lifeless body onto the stretcher, begin working on access, connecting leads. I stand up slowly and take a deep breath. The board is set; the next move is mine.

Welcome back, old friend. You open well. Let’s play….

Chess With God

Boris D. Veysman, MDemail address

Article Outline

Copyright

[Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55:123-124.]

Give me a bad position, I will defend it. Openings, endgames, complicated positions, dull draws, I love them and I will do my very best.

—Hein Donner, Chess player, 1950

Not only does God play dice, but… he sometimes throws them where they cannot be seen.

—Stephen Hawking

Amidst a busy shift when patients pile in, seasoned nurses start to grumble, and my blood sugar and bladder volume are most discordant, I overhear a fourth-year medical student share wisdom with a third-year newbie. “ER’s got a good schedule if you like doing overpaid triage.” I smile, enjoying the involuntary adrenaline boost from sublimated anger, before refocusing on the labs of the 80-year-old woman with digoxin toxicity and acute renal failure, presenting with runs of unstable tachycardia, prolonged QT interval, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, and a filthy cough suggesting preseptic pneumonia.

The next 20 seconds is a synaptic typhoon. Could elevated lactate mean not sepsis but mesenteric ischemia? A benign exam would not rule it out, and she is too sick to complain of abdominal pain. Tachycardia and hypoxia suggest pulmonary embolism (PE), given her edematous legs and recently stopped Coumadin when she had a GI bleed. This also increases the risk of mesenteric clot. Yet the contrast timing is different for CT angiograms of chest and abdomen, and I will have to choose which to optimize. Both studies are perilous because of the dye load, given acute renal failure, but failure to make either diagnosis would be fatal in a patient this sick. Meanwhile, empiric anticoagulation risks another massive GI bleed. Dialysis and transfusion may be necessary damage control to be considered concurrently with the diagnostic studies. Furthermore, calcium gluconate is contraindicated in digoxin toxicity because of mostly hypothetic cardiac tetany but would probably help with the blood pressure. Calcium would also treat hyperkalemia and hypocalcemia (strangely equal at 6.5), which both contribute to cardiac toxicity. If the heart gives out, it’s my fault either way, and I find that liberating. Digibind for the hyperkalemic digoxin toxicity, but that will worsen the heart failure. Definitely fluids for hypotension and sepsis but absolutely no fluids because of pulmonary edema and renal failure.

“Dr. V, she’s 80/50,” the nurse reports. Time’s up. Make a move….

We may choose emergency medicine for different reasons, but we fall in love all over again when after a few years of practice we begin to understand its magic. For me, it’s the intensity of thought when time is short and stakes are high in a battle against the worthiest of opponents. There are many hard cases that challenge the depth of our ability and ingenuity. We believe that God plays fair and you often get a shot at winning, regardless of how dismal the malady. A broad differential and rapid and often imperfect diagnostics are often the only way to find in time what’s lethal and irreversible. And before the diagnostics are back, preemptive strikes of empiric therapy based on calculated risks and hunches may earn you a guerrilla victory.

There are no simple cases. Not at this level. There are simple doctors unwilling to try harder to optimize efficiency, cost, and outcomes, to do it with less radiation exposure, fewer side effects, and higher real and perceived quality. Every ankle and ear doesn’t need radiographs and antibiotics, but some do, and most need thoughtful pain management and anticipatory guidance, with the entire encounter limited to only a few seconds by more pressing cases. Every patient, sick or well, is a chance to be our best, to recognize when our best is not enough, and to get help before it’s too late. If it were easy, I wouldn’t want to do it.

When consultants who see the patient the next day whine about “shotgun workups,” “excessively broad antibiotics,” and “inconsistent management,” emergency physicians laugh nostalgically and think, “that was a good save.” However lacking in elegance the evaluation may appear to the hammer who sees the world as a nail, he should have spoken when he was somehow unavailable at 2 am on a Saturday. We are emergency specialists and we step up to the board, for anyone, at any time, and with a unique skill set.

We know that you don’t always get second chances playing against God. Specialists wishing to “see the patient in the morning,” surgeons who interrupt with “what did the CT scan show?” and primaries requesting to “wait for the blood cultures before treating” are occasionally right, but more often they fail to feel our sense of urgency and appear not invested in the battle. Seasoned ER docs are not desperate for approval, camaraderie, or admiration; often we can even write a rain check on respect. When squaring off against our adversary 30 times a shift, self-respect is earned and goes a long way toward self-esteem. But we deserve alliance, for others to be on our side in caring for the patient. This means trusting our instincts. This means respect for our expertise in ambiguity and patients who don’t read the textbook.

The metal doors burst open and the paramedics roll in a man who looks grayer than the sheet. “All we know is he’s got a kidney pancreas transplant with a pacemaker and he’s been depressed lately. We found him unresponsive next to some pills. Good vital signs in the truck but now I can’t feel the pulse.” The third-year med student stares blankly at the paramedic, while the fourth-year looks close to passing out. The nurses run to the gurney to transfer the lifeless body onto the stretcher, begin working on access, connecting leads. I stand up slowly and take a deep breath. The board is set; the next move is mine.

Welcome back, old friend. You open well. Let’s play….

Anxiety, the Worried Well, and Healthcare Reform

A friend just sent me this article from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.  It is insightful, true, funny, but a little harsh at times. The take home message is important: do not be anxious….

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Emergency departments are distilleries that boil complex blends of trauma, stress and emotion down to the essence of immediacy: What needs to be done, right now, to fix the problem. Working the past 20 years in such environments has shown me with great clarity what is wrong (and right) with our nation’s medical system.

It’s obvious to me that despite all the furor and rancor, what is being debated in Washington currently is not health-care reform. It’s only health-care insurance reform. It addresses the undeniably important issues of who is going to pay and how, but completely misses the point of why.

Health care costs too much in our country because we deliver too much health care. We deliver too much because we demand too much. And we demand it for all the wrong reasons. We’re turning into a nation of anxious wimps.

I still love my job; very few things are as emotionally rewarding as relieving true pain and suffering, sharing compassionate care and actually saving lives. Illness and injury will always require the best efforts our medical system can provide. But emergency departments nationwide are being overwhelmed by the non-emergent, and doctors in general are asked to treat what doesn’t need treatment.

In a single night I had patients come in to our emergency department, most brought by ambulance, for the following complaints: I smoked marijuana and got dizzy; I got stung by a bee and it hurts; I got drunk and have a hangover; I sat out in the sun and got sunburn; I ate Mexican food and threw up; I picked my nose and it bled, but now it stopped; I just had sex and want to know if I’m pregnant.

Since all my colleagues and I have worked our shifts while suffering from worse symptoms than these (well, not the marijuana, I hope), we have understandably lost some of our natural empathy for such patients. When working with a cold, flu or headache, I often feel I am like one of those cute little animal signs in amusement parks that say “you must be taller than me to ride this ride” only mine should read “you must be sicker than me to come to our emergency department.” You’d be surprised how many patients wouldn’t qualify.

At a time when we have an unprecedented obsession with health (Dr. Oz, “The Doctors,” Oprah and a host of daytime talk shows make the smallest issues seem like apocalyptic pandemics) we have substandard national wellness. This is largely because the media focuses on the exotic and the sensational and ignores the mundane.

Our society has warped our perception of true risk. We are taught to fear vaccinations, mold, shark attacks, airplanes and breast implants when we really should worry about smoking, drug abuse, obesity, cars and basic hygiene. If you go by pharmaceutical advertisement budgets, our most critical health needs are to have sex and fall asleep.

Somehow we have developed an expectation that our health should always be perfect, and if it isn’t, there should be a pill to fix it. With every ache and sniffle we run to the doctor or purchase useless quackery such as the dietary supplement Airborne or homeopathic cures (to the tune of tens of billions of dollars a year). We demand unnecessary diagnostic testing, narcotics for bruises and sprains, antibiotics for our viruses (which do absolutely no good). And due to time constraints on physicians, fear of lawsuits and the pressure to keep patients satisfied, we usually get them.

Yet the great secret of medicine is that almost everything we see will get better (or worse) no matter how we treat it. Usually better.

The human body is exquisitely talented at healing. If bodies didn’t heal by themselves, we’d be up the creek. Even in an intensive care unit, with our most advanced techniques applied, all we’re really doing is optimizing the conditions under which natural healing can occur. We give oxygen and fluids in the right proportions, raise or lower the blood pressure as needed and allow the natural healing mechanisms time to do their work. It’s as if you could put your car in the service garage, make sure you give it plenty of gas, oil and brake fluid and that transmission should fix itself in no time.

The bottom line is that most conditions are self-limited. This doesn’t mesh well with our immediate-gratification, instant-action society. But usually that bronchitis or back ache or poison ivy or stomach flu just needs time to get better. Take two aspirin and call me in the morning wasn’t your doctor being lazy in the middle of the night; it was sound medical practice. As a wise pediatrician colleague of mine once told me, “Our best medicines are Tincture of Time and Elixir of Neglect.” Taking drugs for things that go away on their own is rarely helpful and often harmful.

We’ve become a nation of hypochondriacs. Every sneeze is swine flu, every headache a tumor. And at great expense, we deliver fantastically prompt, thorough and largely unnecessary care.

There is tremendous financial pressure on physicians to keep patients happy.
But unlike business, in medicine the customer isn’t always right. Sometimes a doctor needs to show tough love and deny patients the quick fix.

A good physician needs to have the guts to stand up to people and tell them that their baby gets ear infections because they smoke cigarettes. That it’s time to admit they are alcoholics. That they need to suck it up and deal with discomfort because narcotics will just make everything worse. That what’s really wrong with them is that they are just too damned fat. Unfortunately, this type of advice rarely leads to high patient satisfaction scores.

Modern medicine is a blessing which improves all our lives. But until we start educating the general populace about what really affects health and what a doctor is capable (and more importantly, incapable) of fixing, we will continue to waste a large portion of our health-care dollar on treatments which just don’t make any difference.

Michael Werdmann, MD

Head Injury in Kids

This is a VERY common concern that I see at work.  “My kid has fallen and hit their head.”

This article clarifies that the VAST majority of head injuries in kids are nothing to worry about and do not need imaging.

Kids under 2:  If they have “normal mental status, no scalp haematoma except frontal, no loss of consciousness or loss of consciousness for less than 5 s, non-severe injury mechanism, no palpable skull fracture, and acting normally according to the parents”, then they are at very low risk, and they do NOT need imaging.

Kids over 2:  If they have “normal mental status, no loss of consciousness, no vomiting, non-severe injury mechanism, no signs of basilar skull fracture, and no severe headache”, then they are at very low risk, and they do NOT need imaging.

They obtained a total of  14,969 CT scans and only 0.1% needed neurosurgical intervention.

How can we improve the Emergency Room Experience

This is a VERY informative interview by a patient who came into an emergency room with chest pain.  We as care givers have a lot to learn.

  • TELL our patients what we are doing; what are the tests we are doing for?
  • UPDATE our patients periodically with results
  • SEND them home with what we think they might have wrong and what we think they don’t have wrong
  • DON’T take so long to discharge our patients….WAITING time is always stressful and agrevating to our patients
  • LISTEN to our patients carefully and make sure that they can’t LISTEN in to our casual conversations

Near Death Experience #1: Nurses perspective

Listen and enjoy and share with us your thoughts about this amazing medical case.  I have NEVER seen anything like it in my career and neither has anyone that I know in medicine.  Listen to the nurses and their perspective of the case.

This is a story of a patient that I cared for whose heart stopped beating but continued intermittently to respond to us as we tried to get his heart to start beating again.